The Three Roles of Network Orchestration
The dispersed factory is a different type of factory floor than the one
Peter Drucker found himself on when he did his famous studies of
management at General Motors. The management needed for these
fixed factories is different from what is needed for these fluid, global
networks. In the flat world, the traditional principles of management
need to be augmented with skills in network orchestration.
What do network orchestrators do? The network orchestrator
plays three primary roles related to the focus, management, and value
creation of the firm or network, as Figure 1-4 shows. Each of these
roles is the expansion of the role of a manager within a more limited
fixed factory or traditional firm.
FIGURE 1-4 The movement from a traditional firm toward a network orchestrator requires a shift in focus from the firm to the network, a shift in management from control to empowerment, and a shift in value creation from specialization to integration. Because few companies are “pure” network orchestrators, and because the world is not completely flat, companies typically need to strike a balance somewhere between the inner circle and the outer one. |
![]() |
Role #1: Design and Manage Networks
First, the network orchestrator needs to shift from viewing the firm as
the center of the universe to looking at the network. Companies don’t
compete against other companies. Networks compete against networks.
Two retail stores on opposite corners in New York City might appear to
be direct competitors, but this is an illusion. They are not competing
against each other in isolation. Each store has a supply chain stretching
from its shelves out to the world. The best supply chain will win. Before
a customer walks into the store, often the game is over based on the
superior supply chain. The best supply chain is drawn from a robust universe
of suppliers. It is no longer possible to compete by looking at a
company in isolation from the network. The network orchestrator also
establishes the values and culture of the network, developing its guiding
principles while absorbing the best wisdom and practices from the network
itself. The orchestrator creates the broader network and then
draws supply chains from it.
Role #2: Control through Empowerment
Second, in a world in which orchestrators do not own the means of
production, they need a different form of leadership and control. A
dispersed global network can devolve into chaos. What holds this network
together? In contrast to rigid control systems used to manage
factories, the network orchestrator relies not just on rewards, but also
upon a combination of empowerment and trust, as well as training and
certification, to manage a network that it does not own. In addition, it
empowers its own managers and suppliers to act entrepreneurially. In
contrast to command and control systems, the orchestrator works like
a guest conductor in an orchestra. The conductor might not have the
ability to hire or fire people, but he or she coordinates a highly skilled
set of independent musicians.
Role #3: Create Value through Integration
Finally, orchestrators have a different way of creating value. Value in the
traditional firm came from specialization, honing skills in specific areas,
protecting trade secrets, and keeping out rivals and even partners. Value
came from fighting for a piece of a limited pie and protecting specialized
core competencies. Value in the flat world, in contrast, comes from
integration, bridging borders as well as leveraging the company’s value
and intellectual property across the network. This integration also
means spanning borders between functions within the company, such as
looking to manufacturing in developing markets to identify new opportunities
for marketing and sales. Orchestrators need to know when to
open the doors wide to create value as integrators and when to produce
value by focusing on the specialized resources of the firm.
The three roles of orchestrators are interconnected and work
together. The more dispersed networks become, the more there is a
need for empowerment rather than direct control. The more empowerment
is given to suppliers and customers, the more managers need
to look across the network rather than focusing on their own firms.
The more organizations move toward orchestration, the more they
need to be able to build and capture value across the network rather
than within the firm. Together, these three roles move companies
from the center circle of the figure to the broader outer circle of the
networked enterprise.

